Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nousresearch
Nousresearch
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Hermes 4 70B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Hermes 4 70B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Hermes 4 70B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureHermes 4 70BQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyHermes 4 70BQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNousresearchQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2026

Hermes 4 70B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Hermes 4 70B has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.9, compared to Hermes 4 70B's score of 9.2.
Hermes 4 70B has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Hermes 4 70B does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.