Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Context Window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Speed
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaNvidia
ReleasedOct 2024Dec 2025

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.8, compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's score of 10.8.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does not support vision.