Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.39 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.90 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.45 Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 66% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins
3
Qwen3.5 397B A17B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.640.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.537.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
8.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
69.2--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
48.186.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
29.0--
AIME
Competition math
13.7--
Qwen3.5 397B A17B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
262,144
tokens
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner
Tokens/second82.7 tok/s55.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.24s1.55s
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 responds 49% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedOct 2025Feb 2026

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.