Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Qwen3.5-27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.20 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$1.56 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.27 Qwen3.5-27B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 67% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Qwen3.5-27B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins
3
Qwen3.5-27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Qwen3.5-27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.637.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.533.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
8.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
69.2--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
48.184.2
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
29.0--
AIME
Competition math
13.7--
Qwen3.5-27B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Qwen3.5-27B
262,144
tokens
Qwen3.5-27B has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Qwen3.5-27BWinner
Tokens/second82.7 tok/s92.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.24s1.32s
Qwen3.5-27B responds 11% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Qwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Qwen3.5-27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedOct 2025Feb 2026

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.