Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5 9B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

116 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 9B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 9B
Speed
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.5 9B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.5 9B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2026

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 9B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B with:

Compare Qwen3.5 9B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Qwen3.5 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.15/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 9B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 21.4, compared to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's score of 15.8.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5 9B has a 262,144 token context window.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does not support vision. Qwen3.5 9B does not support vision.