Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

100 out of our 304 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Context Window
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.04Tie
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.16$0.10 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 21% cheaper overall.

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Providers

DeepInfra $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.06

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
2
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Wins
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.135.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
7.5--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
62.3--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.936.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
55.75.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
70.1--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-34.9-
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Nemotron Nano 9B V2
131,072
tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second118.4 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.28sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Oct 2024

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nemotron Nano 9B V2 with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 7.5, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.