Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Context Window
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Oct 2024

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.