Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.39 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.16$0.90 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.10$0.45 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is 86% cheaper overall.

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Providers

No provider data available

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Wins
3
Qwen3.5 397B A17B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.240.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
7.537.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
62.3--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.9--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
55.786.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
70.1--
Qwen3.5 397B A17B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Nemotron Nano 9B V2
131,072
tokens
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
262,144
tokens
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner
Tokens/second137.2 tok/s55.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.53s1.55s
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 responds 147% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron Nano 9B V2Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nemotron Nano 9B V2 with:

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Nemotron Nano 9B V2's score of 7.5.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.