Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Context Window
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedUnknownSep 2024

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B with:

Compare Qwen2.5 72B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.39/M tokens.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.2, compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's score of 11.9.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has a unknown token context window, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B does not support vision. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not support vision.