Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3 32B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Qwen3 32B
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Context Window
Qwen3 32B
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BQwen3 32B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BQwen3 32B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedUnknownApr 2025

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B with:

Compare Qwen3 32B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Qwen3 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.24/M tokens.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.2, compared to Qwen3 32B's score of N/A.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has a unknown token context window, while Qwen3 32B has a 40,960 token context window.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B does not support vision. Qwen3 32B does not support vision.