Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedUnknownJul 2025

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.27/M tokens.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.2, compared to Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's score of 19.4.