Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BQwen3.5-27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B's score of 31.2.