Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-4.1 Nano wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-4.1 Nano
Context Window
GPT-4.1 Nano
Speed
GPT-4.1 Nano

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4.1 NanoQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-4.1 NanoQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedApr 2025Oct 2024

GPT-4.1 Nano Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GPT-4.1 Nano has a 1,047,576 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
GPT-4.1 Nano supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.