Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5 Nano wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Nano
Context Window
GPT-5 Nano
Speed
GPT-5 Nano

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5 NanoQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.04 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.10 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$5000.00N/A GPT-5 Nano
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 60% cheaper overall.

GPT-5 Nano Providers

OpenAI $0.05 (Cheapest)
Azure $0.05 (Cheapest)

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
2
GPT-5 Nano Wins
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
26.735.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
20.3--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
83.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
78.036.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
67.65.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
78.9--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-34.9-
GPT-5 Nano significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5 Nano
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5 Nano
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
GPT-5 Nano has a 92% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5 NanoQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second141.5 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token110.10sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 NanoQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5 NanoQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2024

GPT-5 Nano Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5 Nano with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GPT-5 Nano scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 20.3, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
GPT-5 Nano has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
GPT-5 Nano supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.