Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-5 Nano wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Nano
Context Window
GPT-5 Nano
Speed
GPT-5 Nano

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 NanoQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5 NanoQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2024

GPT-5 Nano Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5 Nano with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GPT-5 Nano scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.2, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
GPT-5 Nano has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
GPT-5 Nano supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.