Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-5 Nano wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GPT-5 Nano
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Context Window
GPT-5 Nano
Speed
GPT-5 Nano

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 NanoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5 NanoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2025

GPT-5 Nano Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5 Nano has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.1, compared to GPT-5 Nano's score of 14.2.
GPT-5 Nano has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5 Nano supports vision. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision.