Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Track Your LLM Costs Across Every Provider Broken down by user, feature, and endpoint

107 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5 Nano wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GPT-5 Nano
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Context Window
GPT-5 Nano
Speed
GPT-5 Nano

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5 NanoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.07 GPT-5 Nano
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.10 Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.01$0.04 GPT-5 Nano
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is 43% cheaper overall.

GPT-5 Nano Providers

No provider data available

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
GPT-5 Nano Wins
6
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.825.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
14.222.1
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
27.371.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
55.682.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
42.875.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
47.052.4
AIME
Competition math
-71.7-
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5 Nano
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5 Nano
400,000
tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
262,144
tokens
GPT-5 Nano has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5 NanoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Tokens/second122.9 tok/s63.4 tok/s
Time to First Token0.66s1.06s
GPT-5 Nano responds 94% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 NanoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5 NanoQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2025

GPT-5 Nano Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5 Nano with:

Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5 Nano has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.1, compared to GPT-5 Nano's score of 14.2.
GPT-5 Nano has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5 Nano supports vision. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision.