Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2-CodexQwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2-CodexQwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedJan 2026Unknown

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 does not support vision.