Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2-CodexQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2-CodexQwen3.5-122B-A10B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedJan 2026Feb 2026

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has cheaper output pricing at $2.08/M tokens.
GPT-5.2-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's score of 31.6.
GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports vision.