Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3 14B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 14B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen3 14B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 14BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$21.00$0.05 Qwen3 14B
Output (per 1M tokens)$168.00$0.22 Qwen3 14B
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$25000.00 Qwen3 14B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 14B is 100% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 14B Providers

Chutes $0.05 (Cheapest)
NextBit $0.06
DeepInfra $0.12
Alibaba $0.23

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
6
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins
0
Qwen3 14B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 14BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
51.212.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
48.712.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
99.058.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.467.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
90.347.0
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
88.928.0
AIME
Competition math
-28.0-
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.2 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen3 14B
40,960
tokens
Max output: 40,960 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 90% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 14BWinner
Tokens/second98.3 tok/s53.6 tok/s
Time to First Token46.57s1.09s
GPT-5.2 Pro responds 83% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 14B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 14B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Apr 2025

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 14B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Compare Qwen3 14B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 14B has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Qwen3 14B has cheaper output pricing at $0.22/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Qwen3 14B's score of 12.4.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 14B has a 40,960 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. Qwen3 14B does not support vision.