Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$21.00$0.07 Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Output (per 1M tokens)$168.00$0.10 Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is 100% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Providers

DeepInfra $0.07 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.08
SiliconFlow $0.09
Novita $0.09
Parasail $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
6
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
51.224.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
48.722.1
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
99.071.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.482.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
90.375.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
88.952.4
AIME
Competition math
-71.7-
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.2 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
262,144
tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Tokens/second98.3 tok/s53.5 tok/s
Time to First Token46.57s1.15s
GPT-5.2 Pro responds 84% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Jul 2025

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's score of 22.1.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision.