Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Jul 2025

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)'s score of 24.6.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.