Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

101 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$21.00$0.07 Qwen3 Coder Next
Output (per 1M tokens)$168.00$0.30 Qwen3 Coder Next
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$35000.00 Qwen3 Coder Next
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder Next is 100% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder Next Providers

Chutes $0.07 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.15
Novita $0.20
Together $0.50

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
3
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins
0
Qwen3 Coder Next Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
51.228.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
48.722.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
99.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
90.373.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
88.9--
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.2 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Tokens/second89.1 tok/s103.6 tok/s
Time to First Token36.83s0.68s
Qwen3 Coder Next responds 16% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Feb 2026

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Qwen3 Coder Next's score of 22.9.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.