Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

100 out of our 304 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$21.00$0.09 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$168.00$1.10 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is 99% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $0.09 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.10
Chutes $0.10
SiliconFlow $0.14
AtlasCloud $0.15

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
6
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins
0
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
51.220.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
48.715.3
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
99.066.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.481.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
90.373.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
88.968.4
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.2 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
262,144
tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructWinner
Tokens/second99.7 tok/s157.9 tok/s
Time to First Token27.00s1.13s
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct responds 58% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Sep 2025

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Compare Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $1.10/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's score of 15.3.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct does not support vision.