Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Best Coding Model Leaderboard Find the top LLM for coding by benchmarks and community votes

114 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$21.00$0.15 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Output (per 1M tokens)$168.00$1.20 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 99% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking Providers

AtlasCloud $0.15 (Cheapest)
Together $0.15 (Cheapest)
Nebius $0.15 (Cheapest)
Google $0.15 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.15 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins
0
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
51.2--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
48.7--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
99.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
90.3--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
88.9--
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.2 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
128,000
tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 68% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingWinner
Tokens/second84.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token33.06sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Sep 2025

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Compare Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's score of N/A.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a 128,000 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking does not support vision.