Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

102 out of our 300 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$21.00$0.20 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$168.00$0.88 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$110000.00 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 99% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $0.20 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.21
Fireworks $0.22
AtlasCloud $0.30
SiliconFlow $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
6
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins
0
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
51.220.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
48.716.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
99.070.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.482.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
90.371.2
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
88.959.4
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.2 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
262,144
tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructWinner
Tokens/second93.4 tok/s45.9 tok/s
Time to First Token30.81s1.10s
GPT-5.2 Pro responds 103% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Sep 2025

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Compare Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.88/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's score of 16.5.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports vision.