Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Best Coding Model Leaderboard Find the top LLM for coding by benchmarks and community votes

114 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$21.00$0.13 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$168.00$0.52 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 100% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Providers

Alibaba $0.13 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.15
Phala $0.20
Novita $0.20
SiliconFlow $0.29

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
6
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins
0
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
51.216.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
48.714.3
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
99.072.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.476.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
90.369.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
88.947.6
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.2 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 67% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWinner
Tokens/second89.5 tok/s105.4 tok/s
Time to First Token38.51s0.92s
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct responds 18% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.2 ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Oct 2025

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Compare Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.13/M tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.52/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's score of 14.3.
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports vision.