Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Qwen VL Max

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen VL Max wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen VL Max
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexQwen VL Max
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.3 CodexQwen VL Max
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2025

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen VL Max Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Compare Qwen VL Max with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen VL Max has cheaper input pricing at $0.52/M tokens. Qwen VL Max has cheaper output pricing at $2.08/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Qwen VL Max's score of N/A.
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen VL Max has a 131,072 token context window.
GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision. Qwen VL Max supports vision.