Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-OSS-120b vs Qwen-Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen-Turbo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
Qwen-Turbo
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-OSS-120bQwen-Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-OSS-120bQwen-Turbo
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2025

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen-Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-OSS-120b with:

Compare Qwen-Turbo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen-Turbo has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.5, compared to Qwen-Turbo's score of N/A.
GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen-Turbo has a 131,072 token context window.
GPT-OSS-120b supports vision. Qwen-Turbo does not support vision.