Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-OSS-120b vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.07 GPT-OSS-120b
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.19$0.10 Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-OSS-120b is 2% cheaper overall.

GPT-OSS-120b Providers

Chutes $0.04 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.05
Novita $0.05
Clarifai $0.09
Google $0.09

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Providers

DeepInfra $0.07 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.08
SiliconFlow $0.09
Novita $0.09
Parasail $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
5
GPT-OSS-120b Wins
1
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
33.324.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
28.622.1
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
93.471.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
80.882.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
78.275.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
87.852.4
Aider
Real-world code editing
41.8--
AIME
Competition math
-71.7-
GPT-OSS-120b significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-OSS-120b
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-OSS-120b
131,072
tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
262,144
tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Tokens/second311.5 tok/s53.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s1.15s
GPT-OSS-120b responds 482% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2025

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-OSS-120b with:

Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.6, compared to Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's score of 22.1.
GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-OSS-120b does not support vision. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision.