Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-OSS-120b vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Context Window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2025

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.1, compared to GPT-OSS-120b's score of 15.5.
GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-OSS-120b supports vision. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision.