Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-OSS-120b vs Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
GPT-OSS-120b
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-OSS-120bQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-OSS-120bQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Unknown

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-OSS-120b with:

Compare Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.5, compared to Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)'s score of 13.7.
GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) has a unknown token context window.
GPT-OSS-120b supports vision. Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) does not support vision.