Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Opengvlab
Opengvlab
vs
Qwen
Qwen

InternVL3 78B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

InternVL3 78B wins:

  • Supports vision

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Context Window
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureInternVL3 78BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyInternVL3 78BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorOpengvlabQwen
ReleasedUnknownOct 2024

InternVL3 78B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
InternVL3 78B has a 16,384 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
InternVL3 78B supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.