Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Opengvlab
Opengvlab
vs
Qwen
Qwen

InternVL3 78B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

InternVL3 78B wins:

  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureInternVL3 78BQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyInternVL3 78BQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorOpengvlabQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

InternVL3 78B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
InternVL3 78B has a 16,384 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
InternVL3 78B supports vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.