Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Opengvlab
Opengvlab
vs
Qwen
Qwen

InternVL3 78B vs Qwen3.5 9B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

InternVL3 78B wins:

  • Supports vision

Qwen3.5 9B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 9B
Speed
Qwen3.5 9B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureInternVL3 78BQwen3.5 9B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyInternVL3 78BQwen3.5 9B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorOpengvlabQwen
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

InternVL3 78B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5 9B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 9B has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen3.5 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.15/M tokens.
InternVL3 78B has a 16,384 token context window, while Qwen3.5 9B has a 262,144 token context window.
InternVL3 78B supports vision. Qwen3.5 9B does not support vision.