Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Context Window
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Speed
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.12$0.04 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.39$0.10 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 71% cheaper overall.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $0.12 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.30
Novita $0.38
Hyperbolic $0.40

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
2
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Wins
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
15.635.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
11.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
14.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
72.036.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
49.15.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
27.6--
Aider
Real-world code editing
65.4--
AIME
Competition math
16.0--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-34.9-
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second45.6 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.11sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedSep 2024Oct 2024

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen2.5 72B Instruct with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 11.9, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.