Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs GLM 4.5 Air

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 4.5 Air
Context Window
GLM 4.5 Air
Speed
GLM 4.5 Air

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 72B InstructGLM 4.5 Air
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 72B InstructGLM 4.5 Air
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedSep 2024Jul 2025

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 4.5 Air Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.39/M tokens.
GLM 4.5 Air scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 23.8, compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's score of 11.9.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window, while GLM 4.5 Air has a 131,072 token context window.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not support vision. GLM 4.5 Air does not support vision.