Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Context Window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Speed
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.07 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.10Tie
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 30% cheaper overall.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Providers

DeepInfra $0.07 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.08
SiliconFlow $0.09
Novita $0.09
Parasail $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins
2
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
35.224.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-22.1-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-71.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
36.582.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
5.575.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-52.4-
AIME
Competition math
-71.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
34.9--
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
262,144
tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner
Tokens/secondN/A53.5 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.15s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedOct 2024Jul 2025

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.1, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision.