Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.22 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.10$1.00 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$22000.00 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 87% cheaper overall.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
Novita $0.30
Vercel $0.40
Nebius $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins
2
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
35.224.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-24.6-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-39.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
36.578.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
5.561.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-58.5-
AIME
Competition math
-47.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
34.9--
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/secondN/A54.4 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.67s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedOct 2024Jul 2025

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 24.6, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.