Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 Max

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

Qwen3 Max wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Max
Context Window
Qwen3 Max
Speed
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 MaxWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.03$1.20 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.11$6.00 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$15000.00$240000.00 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is 98% cheaper overall.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Providers

Chutes $0.03 (Cheapest)
Hyperbolic $0.20
Cloudflare $0.66

Qwen3 Max Providers

Alibaba $1.20 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Wins
4
Qwen3 Max Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 MaxWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.931.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-26.4-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-80.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
63.584.1
GPQA
Graduate-level science
41.776.4
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
29.576.7
Aider
Real-world code editing
72.9--
AIME
Competition math
12.0--
Qwen3 Max significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
Qwen3 Max
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Qwen3 Max has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 MaxWinner
Tokens/second40.4 tok/s27.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.48s2.37s
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct responds 49% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Max
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 Max
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedNov 2024Sep 2025

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Max Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct with:

Compare Qwen3 Max with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.11/M tokens.
Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 26.4, compared to Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's score of N/A.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen3 Max has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct does not support vision. Qwen3 Max does not support vision.