Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Sao10k

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Context Window
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Speed
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenSao10k
ReleasedNov 2024Aug 2024

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.