Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Sao10k

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Context Window
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Speed
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLlama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.03$0.04 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.11$0.05 Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Cache Read (per 1M)$15000.00N/A Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 15% cheaper overall.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Providers

Chutes $0.03 (Cheapest)
Hyperbolic $0.20
Cloudflare $0.66

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Providers

DeepInfra $0.04 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.05

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
2
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Wins
1
Llama 3 8B Lunaris Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLlama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.925.6
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
63.531.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
41.76.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
29.5--
Aider
Real-world code editing
72.9--
AIME
Competition math
12.0--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-32.1-
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins 2 out of 7 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
8,192
tokens
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLlama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Tokens/second40.4 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.48sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenSao10k
ReleasedNov 2024Aug 2024

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3 8B Lunaris with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Llama 3 8B Lunaris's score of N/A.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.