Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen-Max vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen-Max wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Qwen-Max
Speed
Qwen-Max

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen-MaxMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen-MaxMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2025Unknown

Qwen-Max Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen-Max with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $3.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Qwen-Max's score of N/A.
Qwen-Max has a 32,768 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Qwen-Max does not support vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.