Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen-Max vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen-Max wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Has reasoning mode

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen-Max
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5 Turbo
Speed
Qwen-Max

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen-MaxGLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen-MaxGLM-5 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2025Mar 2026

Qwen-Max Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen-Max with:

Compare GLM-5 Turbo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen-Max has cheaper input pricing at $1.04/M tokens. GLM-5 Turbo has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
GLM-5 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.8, compared to Qwen-Max's score of N/A.
Qwen-Max has a 32,768 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
Qwen-Max does not support vision. GLM-5 Turbo does not support vision.