Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)MiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)MiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedSep 2025Unknown

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has cheaper output pricing at $0.78/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)'s score of N/A.
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has a 1,000,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) does not support vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.