Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen-Plus vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen-Plus wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen-Plus
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen-Plus
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen-PlusQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen-PlusQwen3.5-27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedFeb 2025Feb 2026

Qwen-Plus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen-Plus with:

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen-Plus has cheaper output pricing at $0.78/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Qwen-Plus's score of N/A.
Qwen-Plus has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen-Plus does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.