Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen-Turbo vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen-Turbo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen-Turbo
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen-Turbo

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen-TurboQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen-TurboQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedFeb 2025Feb 2026

Qwen-Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen-Turbo with:

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen-Turbo has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Qwen-Turbo has cheaper output pricing at $0.13/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen-Turbo's score of N/A.
Qwen-Turbo has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen-Turbo does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.