Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen VL Max vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen VL Max wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen VL MaxQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen VL MaxQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedFeb 2025Feb 2026

Qwen VL Max Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen VL Max with:

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper input pricing at $0.39/M tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen VL Max's score of N/A.
Qwen VL Max has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen VL Max supports vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.