Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen VL Max vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen VL Max wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen VL Max
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Qwen VL Max
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen VL MaxMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen VL MaxMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2025Unknown

Qwen VL Max Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen VL Max with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen VL Max has cheaper input pricing at $0.52/M tokens. Qwen VL Max has cheaper output pricing at $2.08/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Qwen VL Max's score of N/A.
Qwen VL Max has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Qwen VL Max supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.