Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen VL Plus vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen VL Plus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen VL Plus
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen VL PlusQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen VL PlusQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedFeb 2025Feb 2026

Qwen VL Plus Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen VL Plus with:

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen VL Plus has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. Qwen VL Plus has cheaper output pricing at $0.41/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen VL Plus's score of N/A.
Qwen VL Plus has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen VL Plus supports vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.