Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen1.5 14B Chat vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen1.5 14B Chat wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Qwen1.5 14B Chat
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
MiMo v2 Omni

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen1.5 14B ChatMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen1.5 14B ChatMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Qwen1.5 14B Chat Modalities

Input
Output

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen1.5 14B Chat has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Qwen1.5 14B Chat has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Qwen1.5 14B Chat has a 32,768 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen1.5 14B Chat does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.