Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Stepfun-ai

Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 Coder 3B InstructStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 Coder 3B InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenStepfun-ai
ReleasedUnknownJan 2026

Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.