Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 Max

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Max wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Max
Context Window
Qwen3 Max
Speed
Qwen3 Max

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen2.5 VL 32B InstructQwen3 MaxWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$1.20 Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.22$6.00 Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$25000.00$240000.00 Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is 96% cheaper overall.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct Providers

Chutes $0.05 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.20

Qwen3 Max Providers

Alibaba $1.20 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct Wins
4
Qwen3 Max Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen2.5 VL 32B InstructQwen3 MaxWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.231.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-26.4-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-80.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
69.784.1
GPQA
Graduate-level science
46.676.4
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
24.876.7
AIME
Competition math
11.0--
Qwen3 Max significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
16,384
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Qwen3 Max
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Qwen3 Max has a 94% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen2.5 VL 32B InstructQwen3 MaxWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s27.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s2.37s
Qwen3 Max responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 VL 32B InstructQwen3 Max
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 VL 32B InstructQwen3 Max
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedMar 2025Sep 2025

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3 Max Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct with:

Compare Qwen3 Max with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.22/M tokens.
Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 26.4, compared to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct's score of N/A.
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window, while Qwen3 Max has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports vision. Qwen3 Max does not support vision.