Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2025Unknown

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.80/M tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.80/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's score of N/A.
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.