Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 1.7B Base vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 1.7B Base wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Qwen3 1.7B Base
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 1.7B BaseQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 1.7B BaseQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Qwen3 1.7B Base Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 1.7B Base with:

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 1.7B Base has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. Qwen3 1.7B Base has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Qwen3 1.7B Base's score of N/A.
Qwen3 1.7B Base has a unknown token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 1.7B Base does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.